I was watching C-SPAN last night, partaking of the Comedic Caper that took place on Capitol Hill yesterday. Here are my thoughts:
1. McNamee seemed more believable to me. He admitted to his lies to reporters, and the process by which he was essentially caught and had to tell the truth. Apparently Congressman Burton can’t understand the distinction between lying to reporters in 2005 and lying to Congress under oath in 2008.
2. Roger can’t answer a question to save his life, and he was in way over his head intellectually (which is surprising considering how dumb most of the Republicans looked). He couldn’t understand that 2 conversastions with McNamee about injecting his wife with HGH qualify as conversations about HGH with McNamee, which he repeatedly denied having earlier in his deposition. If my wife was having a reaction to an injection to HGH, I’d certainly call my doctor and study up on HGH fast. Yet, Roger claims he knows next to nothing about HGH. Mind boggling how goofy this guy comes across. Great pitcher, but the IQ of a turnip. He was caught in a number of inconsistencies, and offered no reasonable explanation for them. His abuse of the English language was comical.
3. Sadly this was politicized. By and large the Republicans went after McNamee. Souder, who was burned by Palmeiro in 2005, was the exception. I guess his autograph parade through the offices last week paid off (Souder again declined). The Democrats, who did look far more prepared than the Republicans, pretty much went after Clemens. Congressman Mica of Florida, aka Master of the Obvious, was doing his best Forrest Gump imitation, seeming entirely clueless.
4. Lost in the comedic caper, by most of the participants, was the testimony of Pettite & Knobloch. Hmmm, Andy increased the number of times he admits taking HGH. Why can’t McNamee remember more accurately over time? But in those instances McNamee told the truth. Why would he be lying with regard to Roger? Roger never explained that. Roger tried to throw Andy under the bus with his wife and agents by saying he “misremembered” Roger. Andy’s conversations with Roger show that Roger intended to lie (or had deceived himself). Could Roger come up with any compelling reason for Andy to say this? No.
5. The Nanny Gate aspect is interesting, though not conclusive. She does not remember a party, but did remember the whole family, including Roger, getting a tour of Jose’s home. She thinks that Roger played golf with Jose. This does not mean much regarding McNamee’s testimony, but the fact that Clemens himself met with her prior to her deposition is disconcerting. His lawyers? Yes, that would be normal. But Roger should not have been there- it could easily be considered intimidation. And intimidation is Roger’s bread and butter as a pitcher. This also seems to be the way he has gone about defending himself. I missed this part, but apparently Roger admitted he may have been at the party.
“After all the denials, Clemens basically said, ‘Well, yeah, it’s possible I could have stopped by Canseco’s house, maybe dropped off the family, swung by after golf and before going to the ballpark….’ Hmmm. How did Davis follow up on that admission? Well, he didn’t.””
Last night I caught the end of the Seinfeld episode where Jerry won’t admit to watching Melrose Place to a woman he was dating. He faced a lie detector test, since she was a policewoman and smelled a lie. He asked George how to beat the test. “If you believe it, (pregnant pause) it’s not a lie.” As I’ve said in other posts, I think Roger really believes he’s telling the truth, but he’s not.
Read Full Post »