A recent theology exam included questions about the teolology and methodology of the Apostles’ use of the Old Testament in the New Testament. The candidate agreed with their Christological goal, but had some criticisms for their methodology. This issue is part of the controversy over Peter Enns’ book Inspiration and Incarnation. His srgument in the book created quite the stir, resulting in his leaving Westminster Theological Seminary. Enns and Bruce Waltke state their respective cases on the matter in the lastest issue of WTJ.
Good for us, Dr. Roger Nicole’s 1958 article New Testament Use of the Old Testament is now available online. He addresses the range, authority and accuracy of the New Testament usage of the Old Testament. Dr. Nicole helps us to understand that we should not hold the New Testament authors to the standards of a doctrinal thesis.
Personally, I’m uncomfortable with criticism of how the Apostles used the Old Testament. That is because I affirm the dual authorship of Scripture. It is divinely inspired (2 Timothy 3:16), and God used real people in a way that they wrote in accordance with their personality, culture and circumstances. This means that one cannot criticize the human authors without also criticizing the Spirit of Christ who inspired them. That same Spirit inspired the original OT Scriptures which had an original meaning and a greater fulfillment in Christ. The OT, in addition to having an original meaning, often has a typological function. This explains why some verses seem to be taken out of context.
But who cares what the Cavman thinks- read Dr. Nicole!