Doubt is an interesting period piece set in the 1960’s shortly after JFK’s assassination. It takes place in an inner city parish. Philip Seymour Hoffman plays the parish priest who finds himself in a battle with a Pharisaical nun (Meryl Streep) how serves as principle of the Catholic school. It plays, in part, on the fear of the pedophile scandal to set up the Javier-like persecution of the priest by the nun.
Without proof, she is certain he is a child molester. As a result of her dislike of him, she misinterprets all his actions. It is a depiction of how dangerous our “certainty” can be when it is not grounded in reality. Our subjectivism easily runs rampant, destroying the lives of others in the process. Even (especially?) the life of the moral crusader
Caught in the tussel is the young boy he’s accused of abusing. And a young nun (Amy Adams) who teaches at the school. She is the one who initially thinks something is wrong, triggering the principal’s crusade. But she wants a different kind of certainty.
The movie leaves one in doubt, of a kind. At the end you aren’t sure exactly what the priest has done. He’s guilty of something, afraid she will dig it up. But it seems not to be what she accuses him of doing. Yet you see some of the actions/behaviors that created the priest scandal.
Also at work is the conflict, in the mid-60’s between the pre-Vatican II and Vatican II movements. The nun represents the old school, and the priest wants to see a new wind blow through the Catholic Church. This is part of why she despises him and willingly entertains these suspicions. I think about our current political context where some people are easily smeared (falsely) due to their affiliation.
So you have a compelling story, and a terrific cast of actors combining to create an exceptional film that opens the door to think about how we really view things.