Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘PC (USA)’


I finally put my thoughts and impressions of the PCA General Assembly, comparing it with the ARP Synods I have attended.  I’ve been scanning reports from other denominational meetings.  While I may not be thoroughly pleased with the denominations I’ve worked with (why should I?) there are some that I would have a most difficult time.

The PC (USA) General Assembly has just gotten started.  And it was an interesting beginning to say the least.

The sermon and infant baptism focused on the future of the denomination – but not before the assemblage faced east, west, north and south while praying for the Holy Spirit to come and watching people in animal costumes march up the aisles and wander through the worship space.

Elder Fern Cloud of Dakota Presbytery led the call to worship at the Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly’s opening worship ceremony Sunday morning, which included interpretative dancing and four processions of flowing banners led by animals such as buffalo and eagle.

Reminiscent of the 2010 Winter Olympics opening ceremony in Vancouver, people dressed as skunks, rabbits and wolves paid homage to the area’s Native American heritage to the sound of a rhythmic drum beat and flute.

One hot issue for them (yet again) is the G.6, or The Fidelity and Chastity Standard for elected office in the denomination.  The female ruling elder who was elected moderator had this to say about the rule that required officers to either be faithfully married (heterosexual) or celibate if single:

“I have been a strong advocate of removing G-6.01016b (the fidelity and chastity standard for elected officers) from the Book of Order. I think it is a stain on the Gospel. I think it does not carry out the inclusivity that we need. And as a lawyer I think it’s pragmatically stupid because it means that we lose many faithful and committed people just because of their sexual orientation.”

A stain on the gospel?  Didn’t Jesus have something to say about adultery and porneia?  They stain the gospel, not fidelity and chastity.  This may finally be the year that the PC (USA), which has half the members it did when I was born, goes down the same road that the Episcopal Church (US) did.  They’ve been trying for years- it is important to be cutting edge you know.  With the floodgates open, the moral conservatives have largely departed.

(more…)

Read Full Post »


This morning I’m working on some PCA history.  Interesting.  I see some interesting parallels with much of what has gone one with the “Confessing Church” and “New Wine” movements in the PC (USA) over the last decade.  Prior to the formation of the PCA, the “Continuing Church” movement was supported by The Presbyterian Journal, The Presbyterian Evangelistic Fellowship, The Presbyterian Churchmen United and Concerned Presbyterians Inc.  These were both ministerial and lay-led groups that sought to reform the Southern Presbyterian Church.  These groups eventually provided the necessary foundation for the structure of the PCA.  They found that working through the church courts failed, since they were a minority.  They found that severing themselves from a corrupted body was the only option.

With that, we move to church censures & councils.

Chapter XXX: Of Church Censures

245. What is the nature and extent of Church power? The keys of the kingdom include the power to retain and remit sin, to excommunicate the impenitent, admit the repentant thru the ministry of the gospel.

246. What is Church censure (discipline)?  It is formally addressing the sin of another to promote repentance, and utilizing certain consequences to warn the impenitent.

247. Is Church discipline necessary? Why? It is necessary to restore sinners, defend the honor of Christ, and protect the church from unholy influences.  Our propensity to sin makes it necessary.

248. What are the steps of Church discipline? Demonstrate from scripture.   Mt. 18- admonish privately, if not repentant admonish with 2-3 witnesses, if not repentant inform the Session who will take appropriate action (rebuke, suspension or excommunication).

249. Are you personally committed to Church discipline? Yes, though it can be difficult without the support of the Session.

Chapter XXXI: Of Synods and Councils

250. Upon what grounds does the believer in Christ owe obedience to the church courts?  They are duly appointed authorities to which we owe our submission unless to do so is to sin (Heb. 13).

251. May church councils err? Give an example where this has occurred.  Yes, they can.  First they used “like substances” instead of “same substance” to describe the Trinity with respect to the Son.

252. Explain how you understand subscription to the second ordination vow.   I understand it to be subscription to the system of doctrine contained in the Westminster Standards.  Some matters are of greater import than others, “striking to the vitals.”  Exceptions to the vitals of the Westminster Standards should not be permitted.  In lesser matters, exceptions may be permitted according to the wisdom of the court.

Let me say that while technically I argue for “loose” subscriptionism I am personally a strict subscriptionist.  Theological legalism can be as great a danger as theological libertarianism (once again, witness the Marrow Controversy).  My sole exception on the Westminster Confession is regarding recreation on the Sabbath.  I take a Continental Position, argued for by John Calvin.  The current use of loose subscriptionism is not like that of earlier generations which was used to gut the faith of its essentials.  A key difference to keep in mind.

Read Full Post »