This is really part 3, but the 2nd part was limited to the idea of Gospel Pardon arising from the book. I’ve now finished the first part of The Marrow of Modern Divinity. The 2nd part is an exposition of the law. The first, and original, part covered some significant territory. In case you didn’t read the other post, I’m reading the new edition with notes by Thomas Boston.
I previously wrote about the difference between the law of works and the law of Christ. Fisher writes in the form of a dialogue between a legalist, an antinomian, a new convert and a pastor. The pastor helps to sort out their misunderstandings about our relationship to the law. I won’t revisit that territory.
The dialogue touches on the free offer of the gospel. There was a strain of legalism that was hyper-Calvinistic which rejected (and still does) the free offer of the gospel. They restrict the offer of the gospel to those who show signs of being elect- seeking Christ, and conviction of sin are two. Some have since accused Fisher of teaching a universal pardon, or his doctrine implying one. Thomas Boston protects him from such erroneous charges in his notes.
“… yet so long as the Lord has concealed their names, and not set a mark of reprobation upon any man in particular, but offers the pardon generally to all, without having any respect either to election or reprobation, …” Edward Fisher
The Scriptures often make a general pronouncement of the pardon. In fact, all men everywhere are commanded to repent. we are merely calling them to repentance in light of the work of Christ for sinners. God is the one who sheds his light into their hearts and converts them (2 Corinthians 3-4). The elect will respond with faith and repentance. The reprobate will not. We are not to play God and try to discern whether or not someone is elect prior to offering them the gospel.
“… for all this general pardon, the formal personal pardon remains to be obtained by the sinner, namely, by his accepting of the pardon offered.” Thomas Boston